April 24, 2000,
Revised October 31, 2002, March 14, 2003, September 7, 2004
"We recently
purchased a home with 20% down, with mortgage insurance provided by the
Federal Housing Administration (FHA). When we closed on it, we were told
that the new federal law effective July 29, 1999 that established the
ground rules for canceling mortgage insurance did not apply to FHA loans.
Is that true?"
Yes, but why in
the world did you take out an FHA-insured loan when you were able to make
a 20% down payment?
"We were
inexperienced first-time buyers, so we went with the lender recommended by
the builder. The loan officer advised us that FHA is secure because it is
a government loan."
The loan
officer probably took advantage of you. I can't say for sure because I
don't have all the loan details, but the loan officer's reason for
selecting an FHA loan makes no sense.
FHA loans are for borrowers
who seek loans no larger than the loan size limits set by the program, and
either can't meet a 3%
down payment requirement, have
poor credit,
or both.
Most FHA borrowers make
down payments of less than 3 percent. FHA allows you to buy a home with 1%
down. Private mortgage insurers require 5 percent down on most
loans, and only allow 3 percent down on special programs. FHA is
also liberal in allowing gifts to be used for paying settlement costs.
(See Are
Seller Contributions Kosher?).
FHA borrowers also
usually have
weaker credit than private insurers accept. FHA allows higher ratios of
expense to income, is more tolerant of existing debt, and will allow the
income of co-borrowers who don't live in the house to count fully in
measuring income adequacy. It is also quite forgiving about bad credit.
For example, a borrower need be out of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy for only 2
years, and out of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy for only 1 year.
But there is a third
group of FHA borrowers that shouldn't exist. It is comprised of borrowers
like you who would meet the requirements of a conventional loan but are
steered to an FHA. They pay more for their loan than they should.
FHA
loans are generally available in the market at about the same interest
rate and points as conventional loans with the same term. There may be a
difference in mortgage insurance premiums, however.
On
an FHA 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM), the mortgage insurance premium
is 1.5% of the loan amount paid up front plus .5% of the loan balance paid
monthly. The premium is the same regardless of the down payment.
On
conventional loans, the insurance premium depends on the down payment.
With 5% down, the premium on a 30-year FRM is about the same as on an FHA.
With 10% or more down, the premium on conventional loans is lower.Borrowers who can put 10% down and have good credit will usually do
better with a conventional loan.
Recently, an additional option has
opened for borrowers who are unable to make a down payment but have strong
credit. The interest rate is higher on these zero-down-loans, but you
don't have to pay for mortgage insurance.
I recently compared the best deal
I could find on the internet on an FHA 30-year FRM with the comparable
zero-down loan offered on-line by Countrywide Funding, one of the major
lenders offering such programs. The FHA loan was at 8% and zero points
while Countrywide's loan was 8.375% and 1.25 points.
When you factor in the FHA
mortgage insurance premium, the cost of the FHA was higher. Assuming no
other charges on either loan, the "all-in" cost of the FHA over
30-years was 8.75% compared to 8.51% on the Countrywide loan. Over 5
years, the difference is even greater, 9.07% compared to 8.69%. Cash-poor
borrowers with good credit should explore this new option.
September 7, 2004 Postscript: Although it does not apply to the
case described above, John Ragano of Virginia Commerce Bank pointed out a
situation where an an FHA loan may be advantageous to a borrower who can
make a substantial down payment. If a borrower has credit good enough for
FHA but not for conventional financing except at sub-prime terms, the FHA
will be better if the borrower can improve his credit over the first year or
two of the loan and then refinances. FHA loans do not carry prepayment
penalties, which most sub-prime loans do, and most of the mortgage insurance
premium will be refunded.
Copyright Jack Guttentag
2004
Jack Guttentag is Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Visit the Mortgage Professor's web site for more answers to commonly asked questions.
Related Articles From Mortgage Professor's web site:
Is FHA Responsible For the Leaky Roof?
March 19, 2001
"We just purchased a home with
an FHA loan and the seller did not disclose many problems?The roof leaks, the
toilet is falling through the floor?FHA inspected the house before we moved
in, and they will get the house if we default and move out? We thought ...
more...
Who Should Take an FHA Mortgage?
April 24, 2000,
Revised October 31, 2002, March 14, 2003, September 7, 2004
"We recently
purchased a home with 20% down, with mortgage insurance provided by the
Federal Housing Administration (FHA). When we closed on it, we were ...
more...
Should FHA Loan Limits Be Raised?
October 11, 2001
"Periodically,
legislation is introduced in Congress to raise FHA loan limits to those
applicable to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Is this a good idea?"
No. The
result would be a rise in FHA ...
more...
Lies Mortgage Shoppers Hear
December 2, 2002, Revised July 16,
2004
"I
am about to shop the market for the mortgage I need to finance my home purchase.
Is there a danger that people won?t tell me the truth?
Any lies I should look out for in particular ...
more...